Friday, September 7, 2018

Stop Drunkard From Voting by Breath Analyzers in Polling booth


To
Election Commission of India,
Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi -110001

Sub: Regarding the request to arrange Breath Analyzers at every polling booth and stop those who drunk from casting their Vote; in order to protect the purity of Election and purity of democratic Republic. Enforce Section 135C of PR Act in letter and Spirit using powers under Article 324 of Indian Constitution.
Respected Sir,
1.       It is humbly submitted that Free and fair election is basic features of a democratic and Republican Constitution. As your Excellency is well aware, the Influence of Alcohol and its influence is judicially accepted fact and the Election Commission of India (ECI) is taking various measures under its powers given by Art.324 of Indian Constitution, to check the Alcohol Influence and provide level playing field in the electoral politics. Article 324 is a reservoir of power to act for the avowed purpose of having free and fair election.
 
2.       It is humbly submitted that the as recognized by the Hon’ble Supreme Court that the power to conduct free and fair Elections is untrammeled which is essential for healthy democracy.

3.       It is humbly submitted  that the phrase ‘conduct of elections’ is held to be of wide amptitude which would include power to make all necessary provisions for conducting free and fair elections.

4.       It is humbly submitted that the untrammeled power of ECI has been recognized by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the following decision.

The Constitution Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mohinder Singh Gill v. The Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi [(1978) 1 SCC 405] “At the bottom of all tributes paid to democracy is the little man, walking into a little booth, with a little pencil, making a little cross on a little bit of paper - no amount of rhetoric of voluminous discussion can possibly diminish the overwhelming importance of the point.

If we may add, the little large Indian shall not be hijacked from the course of free and fair elections by mob muscle methods or subtle perversion of discretion by men ‘dressed in little, brief authority’. For ‘be you ever so high, the law is above you’.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Union of India Vs. Association for Democratic Reforms & Another
In concluding portion of paragraph 92, the Court inter alia observed thus :-
2(a) The Constitution contemplates a free and fair election and vests comprehensive responsibilities of superintendence, direction and control of the conduct of elections in the Election Commission. This responsibility may cover powers, duties and functions of many sorts, administrative or other depending on the circumstances.

The aforesaid decision of the Constitution Bench unreservedly lays down that in democracy the little man - voter has overwhelming importance on the point and the little-large Indian (voter) should not be hijacked from the course of free and fair elections by subtle perversion of discretion of casting votes. In a continual participative operation of periodical election, the voter does a social audit of his candidate and for such audit he must be well informed about the past of his candidate.

5.       It is humbly submitted that considering the above “voter should not be hijacked from the course of free and fair elections by subtle perversion of discretion of casting votes”.
6.       It is humbly submitted that experience shows that the distortion of discretion of Indian voters has been from many angles, such as religion, race, caste, region, gender, liquor, money and other.
7.       It is humbly submitted that the impact of the consumed Alcohol will be present immediately; thereby the voters can’t exercise their votes in free and fair manner. 

8.       It is humbly submitted that Unfortunately Alcohol has become integral part of the Indian Electoral System. The failed experiment of Prohibition demonstrated the formidable demand Indians have for alcohol.

9.       It is humbly submitted that as per Section 135C of Peoples Representative Act, clearly laid down the law to prohibit the drunkard from voting thereby protects the purity of election process, however the implementation of the same is non-existent or biased to target the opposition by the ruling party indirectly controlled election staff at the local level.

10.     It is humbly submitted that Section 135C of PR Act, read as    
135C. Liquor not to be sold, given or distributed on polling day.—
(1) No spirituous, fermented or intoxicating liquors or other substances of a like nature shall be sold, given or distributed at a hotel, eating house, tavern, shop or any other place, public or private, within a polling area during the period of forty-eight hours ending with the hour fixed for the conclusion of the poll for any election in that polling area.
(2) Any person who contravenes the provisions of sub-section (1), shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months or with fine, which may extend to two thousand rupees, or with both.
(3) Where a person is convicted of an offence under this section, the spirituous, fermented, or intoxicating liquors or other substances of a like nature found in his possession shall be liable to confiscation and the same shall be disposed of in such manner as may be prescribed.


11.     It is humbly submitted that Alcohol consumption can cause individuals to lose their ability to think responsibly. Alcohol is associated with a host of familiar cognitive changes, such as a loss of inhibitions, confused or abnormal thinking, and poor decision-making. Even short-term loss of control over normal mental functioning can result in legal and personal troubles that would likely not have occurred if alcohol were not involved.

12.     It is well established in the mental health field that alcohol consumption can exacerbate an underlying mental health disorder.

13.     It is humbly submitted that Alcohol acts on the receptor sites for the neurotransmitters (chemical messengers) known as GABA, glutamate, and dopamine. Alcohol’s activity on the GABA and glutamate sites results in the physiological effects associated with drinking, such as a slowing down of movement and speech. Alcohol’s activity on the dopamine site in the brain’s reward center produces the pleasurable feelings that motivate many people to drink in the first place.

14.     It is humbly submitted that The degree to which alcohol impacts a person’s mood, behavior, and neurological functioning depends in part on whether the blood alcohol content (BAC) is elevating or decreasing. With 1-2 drinks, the person may feel excited or more talkative, but with more and more alcohol in their system, they become more sedated and being to lose control of their movement and may experience impaired thinking and memory. The fluctuation in BAC helps to account for why the same person can go from being the life of the party to needing help with basics, like walking.

15.     The margin of winning candidates is very less even below 100 in many cases. It can be easily presumed that there are more than 100 who drunk and vote, there by the basic structure of Indian Republic, i.e. free and fair elections is threatened. Article 324 is a reservoir of power to act for the avowed purpose of having free and fair election.

For the afore said reasons we request the Hon’ble ECI to arrange Breath Analyzers at every polling booth and stop those who drunk from casting their Vote; in order to protect the purity of Election and purity of democratic Republic and to implement Section 135C of PR Act in letter and Spirit.

It is also humbly submitted that the experiment can be initiated in Telangana in the upcoming Assembly elections and later can be extended to whole of India based on the feedback from the experience.

Thanking You Sir,
Thandava Yogesh, B.E, M.A (Sociology), L.L.B
H:No: 1-3-183/40/35, SBI Colony,
Near Gandhi Nagar Post office, Hydarabad-500080
Ph: 9491783736 e-mail: Yogesh_Thandava@Yahoo.co.in
Party in Person in PIL/165/2017; PIL/86/2018; PIL/128/2018, all on the file of High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the States of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh.

Monday, July 10, 2017

Admission Arguments in Court No:1, WP(PIL) 165/2017 on 4th July 2017



Admission Arguments in Court No:1, WP(PIL) 165/2017 on 4th July 2017:
I have prepared with all flagging and bare acts and drank a sip of water J
As soon as my item number 52 called out, I started with;

Me:Even after 70 years of establishment of Democratic Republic, we see huge Void in the integration of Weaker Sections and Disadvantaged Groups in the mainstream Society. This Void is growing day by day, and threatening the very FABRIC of UNITY and INTEGRITY of The NATION, besides prohibiting these groups to strive for excellence and live with DIGNITY, thus promoting Inequality, Discrimination in Our Democratic Republic Society.(I should have directly told“the Non-Implementation of Section 12(1)(C ) of RTE Act, which guarantees 25% quota in Private Schools, is infringing the Fundamental Rights of more than 14 lakh minor Children who belong to Weaker Sections and Disadvantaged Groups”)

Hon’ble Chief Justice of AP HC: What is Your Main Prayer?

Me: Milord, 25% Quota for Weaker Sections and Disadvantaged Groups in all private Schools

Hon’ble Chief Justice of AP HC: Where is it present?

Me: Milord, u/s 12(1)(C ) of RTE Act,2009; (I handed over the two bare Acts to the court Clerk, and he gave them to Hon’ble Chief Justice of AP HC and Justice T.Rajini)

Hon’ble Chief Justice of AP HC: GP what is your Stance?

GP for School Education of AP & Telangana Stood up:
GP for AP: He has admitted implicitly that they are implementing the Quota, but tried to give excuses, and beating around the bush, saying, they have issued a GO, they are considering it etc.

Hon’ble Chief Justice of AP HC: What is your Stance?

GP for AP: Milord, we will file a detailed Counter; there is also one connected matter.

Hon’ble Chief Justice of AP HC: Admit and connect with the earlier case.

Me:MiLord, besides 25% quota, there are 3 other issues raised in the present petition, milord.

Hon’ble Chief Justice of AP HC: Ok, we will here all of them together.

Me: Oblige Milord.

Hon’ble Chief Justice of AP HC and Justice Rajini; closed the matter:

Court Clerk started reading Item number 53:
Another clerk gave my two bare Act books
I went back to the client gallery.
This happened around 11.15 am
Again around 1.30 Pm I went to Court Room to enquire the connected matter and found that 74/2015. When I asked, when the next hearing of the case, the  steno replied after AP and TS file their counters.

for more details 
http://hc.tap.nic.in/csis/MainInfo.jsp?mtype=WP(PIL)&mno=165&year=2017

Women Equality in Religious Philosophy: Hindu, Christianity and Islam



Women Equality in Religious Philosophy: Hindu, Christianity and Islam
Hinduism
What is the view of Hinduism’s highest scriptures (Sruti) on the position of women?  

Religious scholars agree that Upanishads are the highest among even the Sruti scriptures.  The philosophy of all the Upanishads is summarized in four verses, which are called Mahavakyas (great utterances).  

These are:  
·        aham Brahmasmi (I am the spirit, i.e. atman), 
·        tat tvam asi (That thou art), 
·        prajnanam Brahma  (Brahman is pure consciousness) and 
·        ayam atma Brahma (this self is Brahman). 

 In different ways and by different words, all these four Mahavakyas simply confirm the fact that an individual regardless of religion, race, culture, gender, color, cast, creed or geographic location is atman clothed in a physical body.  The physical body we get is the result of our past karma.  What we are now is the result of our past practice and again practice makes us what we shall be.  The differences between individuals exist only at physical level.   

There are no spiritual differences between man and woman.  The husband and wife are the two sides of the same coin.  They are the two manifestations of the same atman. For this very reason, Swami Vivekananda says, “The husband and wife are the two wings of a bird.”  This is the highest teaching of Hinduism and comes from its highest scriptures.

 The most important rite of the Vedic wedding ceremony is Sapatpadi.  Here the bride and bridegroom take seven steps together around the nuptial fire (Agni) and make the following seven wedding vows to each other:

 “With God as guide, let us take, the first step to nourish each other, the second step to grow together in strength, the third step to preserve our wealth, the fourth step to share our joys and sorrows, the fifth step to care for our children, the sixth step to be together forever, and the seventh step to remain lifelong friends, perfect halves to make a perfect whole.”

 The words “perfect halves to make perfect hole” is the final word of Hinduism on the relationship between husband and wife.  Thus Hinduism provides same religious rights and privileges to women as it does to men.  Neither is woman superior to man, nor is man superior to woman.  Both are “perfect halves to make perfect hole.” 

 The following are quotes from other scriptures that further confirm the equality between men and women in all religious and spiritual aspects:

 “Unite, O Lord, this couple like a pair of lovebirds.  May they be surrounded by children living both long and happy ”  Atharva Veda Samhita 14.2.64
“Let there be faithfulness to each other until death.  This may be considered as the summary of the highest law for husband and wife.”     Manu Smriti 9.101

“May our prayers and worship be alike, and may our devotional offerings be one and the same.”   Rig Veda Samhita 10.191.3

 “To call women the weaker sex is libel; it is man’s injustice to women.”  Mahatma Gandhi

“The wife is not the husband’s bond-slave but his companion and his help-mate and an equal partner in all his joys and sorrows---as free as the husband to choose her own path.”  Mahatma Gandhi

Christinity

Galatians 3:26-29


Galatians 3:28 “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”


Romans 2:11 “For God shows no partiality.”


Islam:
“O mankind! Fear your Lord Who (initiated) your creation from a single soul, then from it created its mate, and from these two spread (the creation of) countless men and women.”
(al-Qur’an, 4:1)
This Verse clearly expounds that man or woman are created from a single entity and are basically equal genders. As a gender, one is not superior to the other.
“And according to usage, women too have rights over men similar to the rights of men over women.”
(al-Qur’an, 2:228)
This Verse denotes that rights enjoyed by men are the duties of the women and the duties of men are the rights of women. This implies a similitude between both the genders. There is no right conferred on man that woman may be deprived of because she is a woman.
“Men, however, have an advantage over them.”
(al-Qur’an, 2:228)
Here the Qur’an refers to man’s superiority by virtue of his responsibility of protection and maintenance of woman and fulfillment of their rights. Nature has made him stronger, more responsible and tolerant with reference to mundane matters of life. So man is held superior to woman in the grade of responsibility.
Social and societal structure of Islam is based on family system which can be secure if made subservient to natural discipline:
“Men are guardians and managers over women.”
(al-Qur’an, 4:34)
The Arabic word ‘qawwam’ used in this Verse denotes support, protection and supervision according to the Arabic usage. The relation between rights and duties in Islam is reciprocal and cannot be compartmentalized. However, man has been made more responsible in connection with the performance of social and economic obligations. Maintenance of woman is the basic responsibility of man in the Islamic Law. At no place has this responsibility been placed on woman. Woman has been freed of the burden of social, political and economic responsibilities. But they have been given more freedom than men under certain rules and regulations and the opportunities for women to capitalize on them are more than those enjoyed by men. For example on economic matters the Qur’an says:
“Men will have a share of what they earn, and women will have a share of what they earn.”
(al-Qur’an, 4:32)
For men is what they earn and for women is what they earn. But woman has not been burdened with the financial responsibilities of family. It has squarely been placed on the shoulders of man; he is responsible to ensure the fulfillment of the rights of woman even though she may be earning herself. It is not her responsibility to bear the financial burden of a family. Whatever she earns is her personal income to which man cannot stake any claim legally. However, it will be an act of benevolence on part of a woman if both of them spend on the wellbeing of their children out of their volition. But whether she earns or not she has been given the guarantee of complete economic maintenance; man is responsible for that.
Men and women enjoy equal rights in all walks of life according to teachings of Islam. Islam regards woman a complete legal personality. Like man it has given woman the right to choose the head of the state, participate in the legislative work and vote in the performance of state matters. Women have been heads of states in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Turkey.